Why is Clinton’s Treasury Secretary Letting the a Sub-Prime CEO Walk Away with Over $50 Million?

March 22nd, 2008 | by admin |
Duminos asked:


Rob Rubin in on the board at Citibank. And, he just took over the top position after the former CEO, Chuck Prince, resigned.

Prince made Citibank and consumers lose billions of dollars in sub-prime loans.

But, Prince is walking away with over $50 million.

Did Clinton’s man do a great job of protecting consumers? Or is he just trying to make his buddies rich at the expense of consumers?

Randy

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • Bumpzee
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Furl
  • Mixx
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Google

  • Should tax payers bail out the sub prime mortgage borrowers?
  • How much mortgage debt is there in the USA?
  • what caused the turbulence in the financial markets as a result of sub prime mortgages, why it affected so man
  • How much mortgage debt is there in the USA?
  • Sub-prime Mortgage Meltdown
  • Regarding the mortgage industry, can someone explain the terms “sub prime” ?
  • A good parasite allows the host to live, are sub-prime lenders good parasites?

    1. 4 Responses to “Why is Clinton’s Treasury Secretary Letting the a Sub-Prime CEO Walk Away with Over $50 Million?”

    2. By William B on Mar 24, 2008 | Reply

      The board of citibank ceos have contracts and chuck princes contract said that he left.

    3. By alphabetsoup2 on Mar 26, 2008 | Reply

      Wow, what a scandal!

    4. By Mr. Morden on Mar 26, 2008 | Reply

      The actions of someone else it has nothing to do with clinton based on the actions of someone else it has nothing to slam clinton based on the actions of someone else it has nothing to.
      The actions of someone else it has nothing to do with clinton based on the actions of someone else it has nothing to do with clinton based on the actions of someone else it has nothing to slam clinton.

    5. By Peter R on Mar 29, 2008 | Reply

      Did you think Washington wasn’t corrupt? Just wait till Bush gets out and we finally get to see what happened to that huge surplus Clinton left us.

    Sorry, comments for this entry are closed at this time.